# Torah Study on Forbidden Relationships: Leviticus 18 and the Challenge of Jewish Values in Modern Society
**What is the focus of Leviticus chapter 18 in Torah study?**
This session centered on The Book of Leviticus (Vayikra) chapter 18, which addresses forbidden relationships and moral boundaries. Chaim explained that the Torah presents laws that are both understandable and not easily understandable, yet all are equally binding. The discussion emphasized that these commandments are part of Jewish law and remain authoritative even when they conflict with modern cultural norms.
The study highlighted that the Torah does not frame these topics as abstract philosophy but as practical guidance for building a holy society. Participants explored how contemporary attitudes toward sexuality, relationships, and personal freedom often differ sharply from traditional Torah values. This creates tension for Jews who are trying to live an observant Jewish life while surrounded by messages that normalize behaviors the Torah forbids.
The tone of the conversation was serious and reflective. It acknowledged that these topics are uncomfortable for many people, especially in today’s climate, but emphasized that Torah study requires confronting difficult material honestly. The session positioned Leviticus 18 not as outdated content, but as a foundation for Jewish identity, spiritual discipline, and moral responsibility.
—
**Why does the Torah emphasize guarding against forbidden desires and relationships?**
Chaim taught that immorality increases desire and makes it harder for a person to follow God’s will. He cited Or HaChaim’s commentary, explaining that once boundaries are weakened, self-control becomes more difficult. The Torah’s restrictions are therefore not only legal prohibitions but also protective boundaries designed to safeguard spiritual growth.
The discussion explored how the Torah views human urges as powerful forces that must be directed appropriately rather than indulged without limits. Chaim emphasized that even behaviors society considers minor or trivial are still significant within Jewish law. The Torah does not evaluate actions based on personal comfort, age, appearance, or circumstance. A boundary is a boundary regardless of context.
This message challenged the modern idea that morality is entirely subjective. Instead, the session framed Torah values as a fixed moral framework that asks individuals to discipline their desires. For people engaged in Torah study, this becomes a central part of religious life: not just learning texts, but shaping character through restraint and responsibility.
—
**How does the Torah address behaviors that society increasingly calls “normal”?**
A major theme in the session was the contrast between societal norms and Torah norms. Chaim discussed topics such as homosexuality, bestiality, incest, and public modesty, noting that the Torah explicitly forbids these behaviors even when culture increasingly normalizes them. He questioned the idea that widespread acceptance automatically makes something morally valid.
The conversation explored how exposure through media, education, and social environments reshapes perceptions of what is “normal.” Chaim expressed concern that repeated exposure dulls moral sensitivity, especially among young people. He emphasized that Jewish philosophy does not define morality by popularity, but by fidelity to Torah values.
This section of the discussion was not framed as political commentary, but as a Torah-based exploration of cultural pressure. The underlying question was: Who defines morality, society or the Torah? The session’s clear position was that Jewish identity requires resisting cultural currents when they contradict Jewish law, even when doing so feels uncomfortable or isolating.
—
**Do genetics and natural tendencies excuse behavior according to Jewish thought?**
Chaim addressed the argument that certain tendencies may be inherited or biologically influenced. He acknowledged that people may experience powerful inclinations, but emphasized that Judaism maintains the concept of free choice. According to the discussion, having a tendency does not remove responsibility for one’s actions.
This idea was framed as both challenging and empowering. Challenging because it demands self-discipline even when desires feel deeply ingrained. Empowering because it affirms that individuals are not prisoners of their impulses. Chaim stressed that Judaism holds people accountable for behavior, not for thoughts or struggles alone.
The session did not claim that overcoming inner struggles is easy. Instead, it acknowledged that battling against ingrained tendencies can be one of the most difficult aspects of spiritual growth. Still, the conversation maintained that Jewish law assumes that human beings are capable of restraint and moral choice, and that this capacity is central to what it means to live a meaningful religious life.
—
**How does exposure to sexual content affect young people and Jewish values?**
Chaim expressed concern about the widespread exposure of youth to sexual content through media, schools, and social environments. He referenced statistics suggesting very high levels of sexual activity among teenagers and argued that this environment shapes behavior long before maturity or serious reflection develops.
The discussion emphasized that many parents hope their children will make thoughtful, values-based decisions, but societal influence often overwhelms parental guidance. Chaim connected this to a broader erosion of modesty and restraint in society. From his perspective, constant exposure normalizes behaviors that the Torah explicitly rejects.
This concern was framed not only as a moral issue, but as a spiritual and educational one. Without strong Torah values, children absorb the surrounding culture by default. The session highlighted the importance of conscious education, boundaries, and role models in preserving Jewish identity in an environment that often promotes the opposite.
—
**What does the Torah teach about intermarriage and preserving Jewish identity?**
Chaim addressed the topic of intermarriage, stating clearly that it is forbidden according to the Torah, even when the non-Jewish partner is kind or the relationship is socially accepted. He emphasized that while Jews can interact respectfully with non-Jews, they cannot validate relationships that the Torah forbids.
The discussion linked intermarriage to a broader weakening of Jewish identity. Chaim suggested that when Torah and mitzvot are no longer central in a person’s life, Jewish continuity becomes fragile. He argued that children raised without strong Jewish values may struggle to see the significance of maintaining a distinct Jewish identity.
He also criticized movements that, in his view, compromise traditional Jewish principles. This part of the conversation underscored the emotional weight of the topic: preserving tradition is not merely intellectual, but deeply tied to continuity, community, and spiritual responsibility.
—
**How can someone strengthen their Jewish identity in a challenging cultural environment?**
The session concluded with a call to seek stronger connection to Torah, mitzvot, and authentic role models within the community. Chaim encouraged participants to look beyond societal trends and instead ground themselves in Jewish learning and values.
The practical message was not about perfection, but about direction. Strengthening Jewish identity means choosing what influences to accept, what values to prioritize, and whom to learn from. It involves recognizing that the surrounding culture may push in one direction while Torah life demands another.
For those engaged in Torah study, for ba’alei teshuvah, for seekers exploring Jewish philosophy, and even for those considering conversion to Judaism, the takeaway was clear: Jewish life requires courage. Courage to question cultural norms, to live with boundaries, and to build a life anchored in Torah values rather than social approval.
—